It appears DeGroot's full name is Franciscus Andreas DeGroot. Despite my thorough investigation, extracting personal details about him has proven challenging. However, I did stumble upon a YouTube video featuring him. He operates a website selling dermaneedling devices, where he proudly declares, "We are the western world's largest dermaneedling company (est. 2006). We sell to private individuals as well as professional customers from our factory in Europe." Interestingly, a closer look at his online videos reveals that he appears to manufacture these devices from a cluttered non sterile room in his home. Alternatively, you can find a document here indicating zero employees, which raises questions about the legitimacy of the operation.

 

It would indeed be intriguing to witness a genuine "factory" setting and to see concrete evidence featuring the individuals behind the names "Frank," "Sarah," or "Martina." However, the absence of any images or videos depicting "Sarah" or "Martina," coupled with the lack of evidence supporting the existence of this purported large-scale operation, leads me to question the validity of these claims. It seems increasingly likely that these individuals may not actually exist, and that there are discrepancies in the information provided.

​

If this were indeed the large-scale operation that he claims, one would expect more definitive proof and evidence to be readily available. The fact that the CEO, "Frank," is the one responding in the chat support raises eyebrows. Typically, for a large company, such tasks would be handled by a dedicated staff. Yet, we consistently see "Frank" or "Sarah" responding. It seems peculiar that the CEO and the supposed "Expert in Dermaneedling" are the ones answering shipping questions.

​

From what I've gathered from others and from my own personal experience, he has a tendency to resort to legal threats or taunts, often saying "then sue us," which is quite perplexing behavior. Personally, I find that engaging with him is not worth my time or energy. I have no interest in pursuing legal action against someone for complete nonsense. 

​

I attempted to share photos of these "Frank" and "Sarah" characters, but predictably, he quickly accuses of doxing and copyright infringement. He writes; "The content is not used in 'Fair Use,' since it is used to doxx me - which is a crime in our jurisdiction. If you do not take down the offending materials, I reserve the right to sue Wix in Prague for damages, penalties, and legal expenses for willingly aiding & abetting Copyright violation to aid in illegal doxxing and criminal defamation - in violation of your own acceptable use policies." The irony is that he consistently engages in doxxing people. I couldn't help but laugh when I read his statement. The audacity is truly remarkable.

It's quite the conundrum, isn't it? He's eager to avoid being doxxed himself but seems to have no qualms about doing it to others.

​

The terms and conditions set by this individual are among the most insane I've encountered. I'm fairly certain they aren't legal, and I'm currently working on addressing that. What's particularly concerning is that in his terms and conditions, he includes a clause stating that by checking the box, you consent to being doxed. So, you're seeking a refund? Well, according to our terms and conditions, we can now take your personal information, slander and libel you, and then, when you simply seek answers, block you. It's absurd that he would expect users to agree to such a violation of privacy. However, as unsuspecting online buyers, we often tick the box for terms and conditions because nowhere else on the planet, and with no other normal company, would you find terms like this. 

​

Inserting unreasonable clauses like "by checking this box you agree to giving me your first born child" or in this case "I sign this binding contract and agree to being publicly blacklisted" into terms and conditions is clearly absurd and would not hold up legally. Such clauses violate consumer protection laws and ethical standards. It's a concerning display of power dynamics and unethical behavior.

​

Companies can include all sorts of provisions in their terms and conditions, but the enforceability of those provisions can vary. In many jurisdictions, terms and conditions must be reasonable and not unfairly burdensome to consumers in order to be enforceable. Additionally, there are laws and regulations that protect consumers from unfair contract terms. If a provision in the terms and conditions is found to be unconscionable or illegal, it may not be enforceable. It's always a good idea to review terms and conditions before agreeing to them and to seek legal advice if there are concerns about their fairness or enforceability.

​

In summary, DeGroot's Terms and Conditions are excessively aggressive, to the point where it's unlikely any government entity would take them seriously. There are consumer protection laws in place to safeguard individuals from fraud and ensure fair treatment in online transactions. Sellers are obligated to uphold these laws and protect consumers, rather than engage in fraudulent activities or threats that could harm individuals.

​​

It's disheartening to experience what we've endured, isn't it "Frank"? So why perpetuate this cycle? My firm conviction is that individuals like DeGroot derive pleasure from stirring up conflict and provoking reactions, or they are undeniably narcissistic. It's challenging to fathom any other rationale for someone who, upon encountering disagreement, promptly resorts to tactics like blocking, doxxing, threatening legal action, or even the egregious act of extortion. 

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

After facing a decade of continuous complaints and similar grievances from various individuals, one would anticipate that DeGroot might take a moment for self-reflection, considering the possibility that the issue doesn't lie with everyone else, but rather with himself. I found it incredibly puzzling to comprehend how he perceives his behavior as normal, but then it dawned on me. He possesses an unwavering conviction that he is always right, firmly believing that there is absolutely no conceivable way for anyone, anywhere, to prove him wrong. Given these circumstances, I felt compelled to establish a platform where individuals who have been unjustly targeted by this man, railroaded for reasons unknown, could find solace and support, knowing that they are not alone in their experiences.

​

Narcissists often struggle with self-awareness and may have difficulty acknowledging or accepting that they are wrong. They tend to have a heightened sense of self-importance and a lack of empathy, which can contribute to a lack of insight into their own behavior. In some cases, even if they do realize they are wrong, they may be unwilling to admit it or take responsibility for their actions due to a fear of vulnerability or a desire to maintain a positive self-image. It's important to note that the degree of self-awareness can vary among individuals with narcissistic traits. It seems his self-awareness is remarkably distant.

​

While I cannot provide a diagnosis, the observed behavior of this individual strongly suggests traits associated with narcissism. It's important to note that only a qualified mental health professional can diagnose a personality disorder. However, the consistent pattern of self-centeredness, lack of empathy, and a refusal to take responsibility for one's actions aligns with characteristics commonly associated with narcissistic tendencies.